This browser is not actively supported anymore. For the best passle experience, we strongly recommend you upgrade your browser.
Norton Rose Fulbright logo
  • Global
  • About
    • Our firm
      • Clients
      • Global coverage
      • Vision, culture and people
      • Governance structure
      • Risk management
      • NRF Transform
      • Alumni
    • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
      • Strategy, goals and priorities
      • Governance and policy
      • Resource groups
    • Responsible business
      • Volunteering
      • Fundraising
      • Sustainable practice
      • Global charitable initiatives
      • Responsible use of AI
  • People
  • Services
    • Services A-Z
    • Key industries
      • Consumer markets
      • Energy, infrastructure and resources
      • Financial institutions
      • Life sciences and healthcare
      • Technology
      • Transport
    • Practices
      • Antitrust and competition
      • Banking and finance
      • Climate change and sustainability
      • Corporate, M&A and securities
      • Cybersecurity and data privacy
      • Employment and labor
      • Energy
      • Environmental, social and governance (ESG)
      • Financial services and regulation
      • Intellectual property
      • Litigation and disputes
      • Projects
      • Real estate
      • Regulation and investigations
      • Restructuring
      • Risk advisory
      • Tax
    • Practices
      • Antitrust and competition
      • Banking and finance
      • Climate change and sustainability
      • Corporate, M&A and securities
      • Cybersecurity and data privacy
      • Employment and labor
      • Energy
      • Environmental, social and governance (ESG)
      • Financial services and regulation
      • Intellectual property
      • Litigation and disputes
      • Projects
      • Real estate
      • Regulation and investigations
      • Restructuring
      • Risk advisory
      • Tax
      • Banking and finance
      • Corporate, M&A and securities
      • Employment and labor
      • Environmental, social and governance (ESG)
      • Intellectual property
      • Projects
      • Regulation and investigations
      • Risk advisory
    • NRF Transform
    • Transform image

      Find out more
  • Insights
    • Publications Podcasts Blogs
    • Webinars and events Videos
    • Professional development Resources and tools
    • colorful light particles
      Trending topics
      • Artificial intelligence
      • Data centers
      • Energy transition
      • International trade and tariffs
    • Trending topics
      • Artificial intelligence
      • Data centers
      • Energy transition
      • International trade and tariffs
  • News
    • Press releases
    • Market recognitions
    • Media information
  • Locations
  • Careers
    • Graduates and students
    • Search current vacancies
  • Careers
    • Graduates and students
    • Search current vacancies
  • Change
  • Global
    • global site
    • North America
      • Canada (English)
      • Canada (Français)
      • United States
    • Latin America
    • Europe
      • Belgium
      • Deutschland (Deutsch)
      • France
      • Germany (English)
      • Greece
      • Italy
      • Luxembourg
      • Poland
      • The Netherlands
      • Turkey
      • United Kingdom
    • Middle East
    • Africa
      • Morocco
    • Asia Pacific
      • Australia
      • China
      • Hong Kong SAR
      • Indonesia
      • Japan
      • Singapore
      • Thailand
    • Regional practices
      • India
      • Israel
      • Korea
      • Marshall Islands
      • Nordic region
      • Pakistan
      • Vietnam
Lake in the forest

Connections

Insights, perspectives and viewpoints from our lawyers on topical issues

All Posts Subscribe
print-logo
6/19/2026 3:39:26 PM | 2 minute read

Pre-ticked and penalised: CMA fines Marks Electrical for pre-selected extra charges

8

Get in touch

Avatar
Jamie Cooke
Partner
Avatar
Gabrielle Martin
Senior Associate

Get in touch

Avatar
Jamie Cooke
Partner
Avatar
Gabrielle Martin
Senior Associate
8

On 18 June 2026, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) imposed a £720,000 financial penalty on Marks Electrical Limited and ordered it to refund approximately £600,000 to nearly 40,000 customers for automatically opting them into paid optional extras when purchasing household appliances online.  

This is the CMA’s second concluded enforcement action under its new consumer powers, following the £4.2 million penalty imposed on Automobile Association Developments Limited (AADL) in April 2026. The decision reinforces the regulator’s willingness to take action against online pricing practices, and is another example of a business settling early in exchange for a substantial reduction in the level of the fine.  

Although the CMA has not yet published its infringement decision, the case concerned Marks Electrical pre-selecting and charging customers for paid optional extras without obtaining their express agreement. These paid optional extras included removing and recycling the customer’s old appliance at the time of delivery (“Recycle Old Appliance”) and unwrapping and removing packaging for the newly purchased product at the time of delivery (“Unwrap & Recycle Packaging”). The affected purchases included essential household appliances such as washing machines, dishwashers and cookers. 

The CMA’s guidance makes clear that express consent is required for optional extras, and that consumers must have a real choice over whether to pay for them. Pre-ticked boxes, automatic opt-ins and similar design choices are therefore not merely commercial decisions as to user experience (UX) issues, but a matter of consumer law.  

The penalty and redress package is also notable. Having admitted liability and agreed to settle early, Marks Electrical’s £720,000 fine reflects a 40% discount, with the undiscounted penalty figure sitting at £1.2 million. The CMA also ordered approximately £600,000 in consumer redress, equating to an average repayment of around £15 per customer. As with the earlier AADL case, affected customers do not need to take any action to claim their refunds, which will be issued automatically to the original payment method, or by cheque where that is not possible.

Marks Electrical should also be viewed as part of a wider enforcement pipeline concerning online pricing practices. At the same time as opening its investigation into Marks Electrical in November 2025, the CMA opened further investigations across a range of sectors, all relating to online pricing practices, including drip pricing, pressure-selling tactics and automatic opt-ins. It will be interesting to see the timing of further outcomes from those investigations. 

For businesses, the immediate message is that online checkout design and related pricing practices remain firmly within the CMA’s enforcement priorities. It’s not surprising that the first cases under the new regime have involved settling parties, and it will be interesting to see if that trend continues. 

With thanks to Hamza Islam, Senior Solicitor Apprentice, for his contribution to this article.

3d render luxury home kitchen interior

Subscribe to our Connections insights Sign-up now

Tags

antitrust and competition

Get in touch

Avatar
Jamie Cooke
Partner
Avatar
Gabrielle Martin
Senior Associate

Get in touch

Avatar
Jamie Cooke
Partner
Avatar
Gabrielle Martin
Senior Associate
Changing tides: How women are shaping the future of maritime
5/15/2026 8:41:55 AM

Changing tides: How women are shaping the future of maritime

By Rebecca Daniels
Rebecca Daniels is a shipping finance lawyer based in London. Working closely with maritime and shipping clients, Rebecca has seen...
6
6

Latest Insights

Luxembourg is bringing out the toolkit: That matters more than it sounds
6/19/2026 2:16:20 PM

Luxembourg is bringing out the toolkit: That matters more than it sounds

By Mirella Hart David Shearer Christian Lambie Victoria Morton Samir Bensaker Geoffroy Hermanns +3 more...

Show less

10
10
Contractual Control Register – Regulations now made
6/12/2026 3:20:20 PM

Contractual Control Register – Regulations now made

By David Hawkins Amy Allen
1
1
Innsworth’s judicial review of Merricks v Mastercard settlement dismissed
6/12/2026 11:12:26 AM

Innsworth’s judicial review of Merricks v Mastercard settlement dismissed

By Caroline Thomas Susanna Rogers Nuala Canavan Jane Kluske +1 more...

Show less

30
30

Explore our site

  • About
  • Careers
  • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
  • People
  • Services
  • Insights
  • News

Key industries

  • Consumer markets
  • Energy, infrastructure and resources
  • Financial institutions
  • Life sciences and healthcare
  • Technology
  • Transport

Locations

  • Global coverage

Norton Rose Fulbright © 2024. All Rights Reserved.

  • Amsterdam
  • ●
  • Athens
  • ●
  • Austin
  • ●
  • Bangkok
  • ●
  • Beijing
  • ●
  • Brisbane
  • ●
  • Brussels
  • ●
  • Calgary
  • ●
  • Canberra
  • ●
  • Casablanca
  • ●
  • Chicago
  • ●
  • Dallas
  • ●
  • Denver
  • ●
  • Dubai
  • ●
  • Düsseldorf
  • ●
  • Frankfurt
  • ●
  • Hamburg
  • ●
  • Hong Kong SAR
  • ●
  • Houston
  • ●
  • Istanbul
  • ●
  • Jakarta*
  • ●
  • London
  • ●
  • Los Angeles
  • ●
  • Luxembourg
  • ●
  • Melbourne
  • ●
  • Mexico City
  • ●
  • Milan
  • ●
  • Minneapolis
  • ●
  • Montréal
  • ●
  • Munich
  • ●
  • Newcastle
  • ●
  • New York
  • ●
  • Ottawa
  • ●
  • Paris
  • ●
  • Perth
  • ●
  • Piraeus
  • ●
  • Québec
  • ●
  • Riyadh*
  • ●
  • San Antonio
  • ●
  • San Francisco
  • ●
  • São Paulo
  • ●
  • Shanghai
  • ●
  • Singapore
  • ●
  • St. Louis
  • ●
  • Sydney
  • ●
  • Tokyo
  • ●
  • Toronto
  • ●
  • Vancouver
  • ●
  • Warsaw
  • ●
  • Washington DC *associate office
  • Legal notices and disclaimers
  • Impressum
  • Standard terms
  • Blog network terms and conditions
  • Cookies policy
  • Privacy notice
  • Website access conditions
  • Fraud alerts
  • Modern Slavery Statements
  • Health plan machine readable files
  • Anti-Facilitation of Tax Evasion Statement
  • Suppliers
  • History
  • Remote access
  • Sitemap
Offices and locations

Norton Rose Fulbright © 2024. All Rights Reserved.

  • Amsterdam
  • ●
  • Athens
  • ●
  • Austin
  • ●
  • Bangkok
  • ●
  • Beijing
  • ●
  • Brisbane
  • ●
  • Brussels
  • ●
  • Calgary
  • ●
  • Canberra
  • ●
  • Casablanca
  • ●
  • Chicago
  • ●
  • Dallas
  • ●
  • Denver
  • ●
  • Dubai
  • ●
  • Düsseldorf
  • ●
  • Frankfurt
  • ●
  • Hamburg
  • ●
  • Hong Kong SAR
  • ●
  • Houston
  • ●
  • Istanbul
  • ●
  • Jakarta*
  • ●
  • London
  • ●
  • Los Angeles
  • ●
  • Luxembourg
  • ●
  • Melbourne
  • ●
  • Mexico City
  • ●
  • Milan
  • ●
  • Minneapolis
  • ●
  • Montréal
  • ●
  • Munich
  • ●
  • Newcastle
  • ●
  • New York
  • ●
  • Ottawa
  • ●
  • Paris
  • ●
  • Perth
  • ●
  • Piraeus
  • ●
  • Québec
  • ●
  • Riyadh*
  • ●
  • San Antonio
  • ●
  • San Francisco
  • ●
  • São Paulo
  • ●
  • Shanghai
  • ●
  • Singapore
  • ●
  • St. Louis
  • ●
  • Sydney
  • ●
  • Tokyo
  • ●
  • Toronto
  • ●
  • Vancouver
  • ●
  • Warsaw
  • ●
  • Washington DC *associate office
Policies and disclaimers
  • Legal notices and disclaimers
  • Impressum
  • Standard terms
  • Blog network terms and conditions
  • Cookies policy
  • Privacy notice
  • Website access conditions
  • Fraud alerts
  • Modern Slavery Statements
  • Health plan machine readable files
  • Anti-Facilitation of Tax Evasion Statement
  • Suppliers
  • History
  • Remote access
  • Sitemap
Visit our global site, or select a location
North America
  • Canada (English)
  • Canada (Français)
  • United States
Latin America
Europe
  • Belgium
  • Deutschland (Deutsch)
  • France
  • Germany (English)
  • Greece
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Poland
  • The Netherlands
  • Turkey
  • United Kingdom
Middle East
Africa
  • Morocco
Asia Pacific
  • Australia
  • China
  • Hong Kong SAR
  • Indonesia
  • Japan
  • Singapore
  • Thailand
Regional practices
  • India
  • Israel
  • Korea
  • Marshall Islands
  • Nordic region
  • Pakistan
  • Vietnam