This browser is not actively supported anymore. For the best passle experience, we strongly recommend you upgrade your browser.
Norton Rose Fulbright logo
  • Global
  • About
    • Back
    • About
    • Our firm
      • Back
      • Our firm
      • Clients
      • Global coverage
      • Vision, culture and people
      • Governance structure
      • Risk management
      • NRF Transform
      • Alumni
    • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
      • Back
      • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
      • Our people
      • Recognition
      • Governance
    • Corporate responsibility
      • Back
      • Corporate responsibility
      • Pro bono
      • Volunteering
      • Fundraising
      • Sustainable practice
      • Global charitable initiatives
    • Photo montage
      RE:

      Read our magazine
  • People
  • Services
    • Back
    • Services
    • Services A-Z
    • Key industries
      • Back
      • Key industries
      • Consumer markets
      • Energy, infrastructure and resources
      • Financial institutions
      • Life sciences and healthcare
      • Technology
      • Transport
    • Practices
      • Back
      • Practices
      • Antitrust and competition
      • Banking and finance
      • Bankruptcy, financial restructuring and insolvency
      • Climate change and sustainability
      • Consulting
      • Corporate, M&A and securities
      • Employment and labor
      • Energy
      • Environmental, social and governance (ESG)
      • Financial services and regulation
      • Information governance, privacy and cybersecurity
      • Intellectual property
      • Litigation and disputes
      • Private equity and venture capital
      • Projects
      • Real estate
      • Regulation and investigations
      • Risk advisory
      • Tax
      • Banking and finance
      • Climate change and sustainability
      • Corporate, M&A and securities
      • Energy
      • Financial services and regulation
      • Intellectual property
      • Private equity and venture capital
      • Real estate
      • Risk advisory
    • NRF Transform
    • Transform image

      Find out more
  • Insights
    • Back
    • Insights
    • NRF InstituteProfessional developmentResources and tools
    • PublicationsBlogsVideos
    • EventsWebinarsPodcasts
    • colorful light particles
      Sustainability and ESG

      Visit the hub
  • News
    • Back
    • News
    • Press releases
    • Market recognitions
    • Media information
  • Locations
  • Careers
    • Back
    • Careers
    • Graduates and students
    • Search current vacancies
      • Back
      • Search current vacancies
  • Change
  • Global
    • Back
    • global site
    • North America
      • Canada (English)
      • Canada (Français)
      • United States
    • Latin America
      • Latin America
      • Brazil
      • Mexico
    • Europe
      • Belgium
      • Deutschland (Deutsch)
      • France
      • Germany (English)
      • Greece
      • Italy
      • Luxembourg
      • Poland
      • The Netherlands
      • Turkey
      • United Kingdom
    • Middle East
    • Africa
      • Africa
      • Burundi
      • Kenya
      • Morocco
      • South Africa
      • Uganda
      • Zimbabwe
    • Asia Pacific
      • Australia
      • China
      • Hong Kong SAR
      • Indonesia
      • Japan
      • Singapore
      • Thailand
    • Regional practices
      • India
      • Israel
      • Korea
      • Marshall Islands
      • Nordic region
      • Pakistan
      • Vietnam
Lake in the forest

Connections

Insights, perspectives and viewpoints from our lawyers on topical issues

All Posts Subscribe
print-logo
6/24/2025 2:42:41 PM | 4 minute read

Strengthening Europe’s defence: The competition law dimensions of the EU’s Defence Readiness Omnibus

European flags at the European Council, Brussels, Belgium
25

Get in touch

Avatar
Tim Schaper
Head of Antitrust and Competition, Germany
Avatar
Jens Steger
Partner
Avatar
David Fila
Associate

Get in touch

Avatar
Tim Schaper
Head of Antitrust and Competition, Germany
Avatar
Jens Steger
Partner
Avatar
David Fila
Associate
25

The European Commission has presented on 17 June 2025 a comprehensive package aimed at enhancing the European Union’s strategic autonomy and industrial resilience in the defence sector: the Defence Readiness Omnibus Package (Omnibus). Against a backdrop of ongoing geopolitical instability and Russia’s aggressive war against Ukraine, this initiative marks a significant development in the way the EU is approaching competition and state aid in the defence industry. 

This insight focuses on the competition law implications of the Omnibus, including planned adaptations to antitrust, merger control, and state aid enforcement. Although the Commission confirms that EU competition rules remain fully applicable, it simultaneously proposes a more security-driven interpretation of these rules, particularly as to horizontal co-operation, consolidation, and public support in the defence sector. 

Long-term ambition

The Omnibus stems from the strategic White Paper on European Defence Readiness. The White Paper outlines the EU’s long-term ambition to achieve full defence readiness by 2030, in response to escalating global threats, supply chain vulnerabilities and the fragmentation of the European defence industrial base. 

The Omnibus is not a single legal act, but rather a comprehensive policy initiative that combines multiple legal and political instruments. It comprises, among other things:

  • A communication from the Commission;
  • Legislative proposals to amend selected internal market and environmental regulations; 
  • A draft regulation to accelerate permitting procedures for defence-related projects; and 
  • Future guidance on interpreting EU competition law in light of defence priorities. 

These proposals are currently at the draft stage and will require formal adoption by the European Parliament and the Council. The package's primary objective is to eliminate the legal, administrative and financial obstacles that currently impede the expansion of the defence industry. 

Among other measures, it facilitates access to EU funding instruments and streamlines permitting procedures by establishing centralised points of contact and statutory time limits. It also encourages Member States to apply EU competition rules, including Articles 101, 107 and 346 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), in a manner that supports strategic autonomy.

Substantive developments

Antitrust and horizontal co-operation

Although Article 101 TFEU continues to apply, the Commission has made clear that co-operation between defence companies should not be unduly hindered by competition rules. In its communication, the Commission states that it will duly take into consideration the specificities of the defence sector, including the urgent need to increase production capacity and strengthen industrial resilience. 

Notably, the Commission expresses its readiness to provide guidance to defence companies that wish to engage in co-operation which might otherwise raise antitrust concerns. This includes informal guidance, particularly where joint action is necessary to produce strategically important defence goods that could not be supplied individually. 

Although no formal guidance document has yet been issued, the Commission's approach is consistent with the practice adopted during the pandemic, when temporary co-operation was permitted and evaluated based on efficiency considerations.

Merger control

The Commission will increasingly consider the contribution of a merger to defence readiness as well as the market structure of the European defence equipment market, which is usually more fragmented and underdeveloped than its global counterparts. For that, the Commission will take into account these considerations in its ongoing review of its Merger Guidelines[1].

Although efficiencies, such as economies of scale or strengthened supply security, will not override competition concerns per se, they are expected to play a more prominent role in Commission’s enforcement as it hints at greater flexibility in applying its decisional practice, particularly where mergers enable the EU to compete globally and reduce strategic dependencies. Stakeholders can provide their views to the Commission in relation to its merger guidelines review by 3 September 2025.

State Aid

Most aspects of the Omnibus in relation to competition law concern State Aid. 

The Commission identified a number of objective factors that limit ramping up defence production (for example, fragmented procurement markets, uncertainty of demand over time, access to finance). Therefore, the Commission felt obliged to provide certain clarifications necessary to boost defence production:

1. Non-economic measures, such as military infrastructure or core military functions, are reaffirmed as not constituting State aid, falling within the scope of Article 346 TFEU[2].

2. Aid for increasing defence production capacities may, in principle, fall under Article 346 TFEU, enabling Member States to provide such aid without prior notification if it is deemed necessary for safeguarding essential security interests.

3. For aid measures not covered by Article 346 TFEU, the Commission confirms that it will conduct a flexible and expedited assessment under Article 107(3)(c) TFEU. The Commission will explicitly consider the contribution of the measure to defence readiness, the resilience of supply chains and the reduction of dependencies as positive factors in its balancing test.

Furthermore, State Aid cases linked to defence readiness will be prioritized administratively. The Commission also encourages alignment with EU defence programmes (for example, the European Defence Fund) and cross-border co-operation.

Key takeaways

The Omnibus represents more than just a political declaration. It signifies a strategic shift in how the EU applies competition and state aid law to the defence sector:

  • Companies in the defence industry can expect a more permissive environment for horizontal co-operation, including joint purchasing and production arrangements.
  • The Commission is signaling greater openness towards consolidation, provided that it enhances the EU's defence capacity and supply security.
  • In State Aid matters, Articles 346 TFEU and 107(3)(c) TFEU will be interpreted pragmatically, focusing on urgency and resilience.

At the same time, the core principles of EU competition law remain fully applicable. Undertakings must still assess whether any co-operation with competitors unduly restricts competition and ensure that any benefits outweigh the potential harm. 

Where uncertainties exist, companies are encouraged to proactively engage with the Commission. Otherwise, it is unlikely that the Commission will tolerate any abuse of its more permissive approach to the detriment of the competitive landscape and increased costs for Member States and ultimately the European taxpayers.

 

We would like to thank our trainee Suna Cavunmirza for valuable support in the preparation of this article.

 

Footnotes

[1] See also NRF Insight: Summer reading arrived early: European Commission aims for balancing act in its review of merger guidelines, 9 May 2025. 

[2] Article 346 TFEU allows EU Member States to take measures they consider necessary to protect their essential security interests, particularly in the defense sector, even if those measures would otherwise conflict with EU internal market rules — provided such derogations are strictly justified and proportionate.

Subscribe to our Connections insights Sign-up now

Tags

antitrust and competition, antitrust and competition

Get in touch

Avatar
Tim Schaper
Head of Antitrust and Competition, Germany
Avatar
Jens Steger
Partner
Avatar
David Fila
Associate

Get in touch

Avatar
Tim Schaper
Head of Antitrust and Competition, Germany
Avatar
Jens Steger
Partner
Avatar
David Fila
Associate
FCA publishes final UK prospectus rules: Key takeaways for equity issuers
7/15/2025 11:38:20 AM

FCA publishes final UK prospectus rules: Key takeaways for equity issuers

By Fiona Millington Richard Sheen Clementine Hogarth Thomas Vita Alexander Green +2 more...

Show less

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has today published its final rules in relation to reform of the UK prospectus regime in PS 25/9:...
72
72

Latest Insights

From deep waters to deep markets: Navigating Yinson Production’s FPSO Maria Quitéria project bond
7/16/2025 3:49:08 PM

From deep waters to deep markets: Navigating Yinson Production’s FPSO Maria Quitéria project bond

By Peter Young Ben Rose
68
68
Building Safety Act applies retrospectively, Court rules in major fire safety case
7/15/2025 8:44:26 AM

Building Safety Act applies retrospectively, Court rules in major fire safety case

By Greg Rouse Amy Allen
22
22
City Week 2025: Key takeaways on digital assets and regulation
7/7/2025 1:53:55 PM

City Week 2025: Key takeaways on digital assets and regulation

By Jonathan Herbst
3
3

Explore our site

  • About
  • Careers
  • Diversity, equity and inclusion
  • People
  • Services
  • Insights
  • News

Key industries

  • Consumer markets
  • Energy, infrastructure and resources
  • Financial institutions
  • Life sciences and healthcare
  • Technology
  • Transport

Locations

  • Global coverage

Norton Rose Fulbright © 2024. All Rights Reserved.

  • Amsterdam
  • ●
  • Athens
  • ●
  • Austin
  • ●
  • Bangkok
  • ●
  • Beijing
  • ●
  • Brisbane
  • ●
  • Brussels
  • ●
  • Bujumbura**
  • ●
  • Calgary
  • ●
  • Canberra
  • ●
  • Cape Town
  • ●
  • Casablanca
  • ●
  • Dallas
  • ●
  • Denver
  • ●
  • Dubai
  • ●
  • Durban
  • ●
  • Düsseldorf
  • ●
  • Frankfurt
  • ●
  • Hamburg
  • ●
  • Harare**
  • ●
  • Hong Kong SAR
  • ●
  • Houston
  • ●
  • Istanbul
  • ●
  • Jakarta*
  • ●
  • Johannesburg
  • ●
  • Kampala**
  • ●
  • London
  • ●
  • Los Angeles
  • ●
  • Luxembourg
  • ●
  • Melbourne
  • ●
  • Mexico City
  • ●
  • Milan
  • ●
  • Minneapolis
  • ●
  • Monaco
  • ●
  • Montréal
  • ●
  • Munich
  • ●
  • Newcastle
  • ●
  • New York
  • ●
  • Nairobi**
  • ●
  • Ottawa
  • ●
  • Paris
  • ●
  • Perth
  • ●
  • Piraeus
  • ●
  • Québec
  • ●
  • Riyadh*
  • ●
  • San Antonio
  • ●
  • San Francisco
  • ●
  • São Paulo
  • ●
  • Shanghai
  • ●
  • Singapore
  • ●
  • St. Louis
  • ●
  • Sydney
  • ●
  • Tokyo
  • ●
  • Toronto
  • ●
  • Vancouver
  • ●
  • Warsaw
  • ●
  • Washington DC *associate office **alliance
  • Legal notices and disclaimers
  • Impressum
  • Standard terms
  • Blog network terms and conditions
  • Cookies policy
  • Privacy notice
  • Website access conditions
  • Fraud alerts
  • Modern Slavery Statements
  • Health plan machine readable files
  • Anti-Facilitation of Tax Evasion Statement
  • Suppliers
  • History
  • Remote access
  • Sitemap
Offices and locations

Norton Rose Fulbright © 2024. All Rights Reserved.

  • Amsterdam
  • ●
  • Athens
  • ●
  • Austin
  • ●
  • Bangkok
  • ●
  • Beijing
  • ●
  • Brisbane
  • ●
  • Brussels
  • ●
  • Bujumbura**
  • ●
  • Calgary
  • ●
  • Canberra
  • ●
  • Cape Town
  • ●
  • Casablanca
  • ●
  • Dallas
  • ●
  • Denver
  • ●
  • Dubai
  • ●
  • Durban
  • ●
  • Düsseldorf
  • ●
  • Frankfurt
  • ●
  • Hamburg
  • ●
  • Harare**
  • ●
  • Hong Kong SAR
  • ●
  • Houston
  • ●
  • Istanbul
  • ●
  • Jakarta*
  • ●
  • Johannesburg
  • ●
  • Kampala**
  • ●
  • London
  • ●
  • Los Angeles
  • ●
  • Luxembourg
  • ●
  • Melbourne
  • ●
  • Mexico City
  • ●
  • Milan
  • ●
  • Minneapolis
  • ●
  • Monaco
  • ●
  • Montréal
  • ●
  • Munich
  • ●
  • Newcastle
  • ●
  • New York
  • ●
  • Nairobi**
  • ●
  • Ottawa
  • ●
  • Paris
  • ●
  • Perth
  • ●
  • Piraeus
  • ●
  • Québec
  • ●
  • Riyadh*
  • ●
  • San Antonio
  • ●
  • San Francisco
  • ●
  • São Paulo
  • ●
  • Shanghai
  • ●
  • Singapore
  • ●
  • St. Louis
  • ●
  • Sydney
  • ●
  • Tokyo
  • ●
  • Toronto
  • ●
  • Vancouver
  • ●
  • Warsaw
  • ●
  • Washington DC *associate office **alliance
Policies and disclaimers
  • Legal notices and disclaimers
  • Impressum
  • Standard terms
  • Blog network terms and conditions
  • Cookies policy
  • Privacy notice
  • Website access conditions
  • Fraud alerts
  • Modern Slavery Statements
  • Health plan machine readable files
  • Anti-Facilitation of Tax Evasion Statement
  • Suppliers
  • History
  • Remote access
  • Sitemap
Visit our global site, or select a location
North America
  • Canada (English)
  • Canada (Français)
  • United States
Latin America
  • Brazil
  • Mexico
Europe
  • Belgium
  • Deutschland (Deutsch)
  • France
  • Germany (English)
  • Greece
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Poland
  • The Netherlands
  • Turkey
  • United Kingdom
Middle East
Africa
  • Burundi
  • Kenya
  • Morocco
  • South Africa
  • Uganda
  • Zimbabwe
Asia Pacific
  • Australia
  • China
  • Hong Kong SAR
  • Indonesia
  • Japan
  • Singapore
  • Thailand
Regional practices
  • India
  • Israel
  • Korea
  • Marshall Islands
  • Nordic region
  • Pakistan
  • Vietnam