This browser is not actively supported anymore. For the best passle experience, we strongly recommend you upgrade your browser.
Norton Rose Fulbright logo
  • Global
  • About
    • Back
    • About
    • Our firm
      • Back
      • Our firm
      • Clients
      • Global coverage
      • Vision, culture and people
      • Governance structure
      • Risk management
      • NRF Transform
      • Alumni
    • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
      • Back
      • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
      • Our people
      • Recognition
      • Governance
    • Corporate responsibility
      • Back
      • Corporate responsibility
      • Pro bono
      • Volunteering
      • Fundraising
      • Sustainable practice
      • Global charitable initiatives
    • Photo montage
      RE:

      Read our magazine
  • People
  • Services
    • Back
    • Services
    • Services A-Z
    • Key industries
      • Back
      • Key industries
      • Consumer markets
      • Energy, infrastructure and resources
      • Financial institutions
      • Life sciences and healthcare
      • Technology
      • Transport
    • Practices
      • Back
      • Practices
      • Antitrust and competition
      • Banking and finance
      • Bankruptcy, financial restructuring and insolvency
      • Climate change and sustainability
      • Consulting
      • Corporate, M&A and securities
      • Employment and labor
      • Energy
      • Environmental, social and governance (ESG)
      • Financial services and regulation
      • Information governance, privacy and cybersecurity
      • Intellectual property
      • Litigation and disputes
      • Private equity and venture capital
      • Projects
      • Real estate
      • Regulation and investigations
      • Risk advisory
      • Tax
      • Banking and finance
      • Climate change and sustainability
      • Corporate, M&A and securities
      • Energy
      • Financial services and regulation
      • Intellectual property
      • Private equity and venture capital
      • Real estate
      • Risk advisory
    • NRF Transform
    • Transform image

      Find out more
  • Insights
    • Back
    • Insights
    • NRF InstituteProfessional developmentResources and tools
    • PublicationsBlogsVideos
    • EventsWebinarsPodcasts
    • colorful light particles
      Sustainability and ESG

      Visit the hub
  • News
    • Back
    • News
    • Press releases
    • Market recognitions
    • Media information
  • Locations
  • Careers
    • Back
    • Careers
    • Graduates and students
    • Search current vacancies
      • Back
      • Search current vacancies
  • Change
  • Global
    • Back
    • global site
    • North America
      • Canada (English)
      • Canada (Français)
      • United States
    • Latin America
      • Latin America
      • Brazil
      • Mexico
    • Europe
      • Belgium
      • Deutschland (Deutsch)
      • France
      • Germany (English)
      • Greece
      • Italy
      • Luxembourg
      • Poland
      • The Netherlands
      • Turkey
      • United Kingdom
    • Middle East
    • Africa
      • Africa
      • Burundi
      • Kenya
      • Morocco
      • South Africa
      • Uganda
      • Zimbabwe
    • Asia Pacific
      • Australia
      • China
      • Hong Kong SAR
      • Indonesia
      • Japan
      • Singapore
      • Thailand
    • Regional practices
      • India
      • Israel
      • Korea
      • Marshall Islands
      • Nordic region
      • Pakistan
      • Vietnam
Lake in the forest

Connections

Insights, perspectives and viewpoints from our lawyers on topical issues

All Posts Subscribe
print-logo
10/9/2023 4:01:50 PM | 3 minute read

The People versus Your Business: The Litigant-in-Person boom

Law and Justice concept. Mallet of the judge, books, scales of justice.
1
15

Get in touch

NR
Nick Roberts
Senior Associate

Get in touch

NR
Nick Roberts
Senior Associate
1
15

There has been a rise in claims brought by litigants in person (LIPs) against commercial clients on the small claims track. Why? Perhaps in the challenging economic conditions, claimants want to keep their damages rather than pay solicitors, or look around for more speculative claims, coupled with the ever present “do it yourself” guidance on the internet and social media. 

But what are the risks businesses face?

These claims can affect any public-facing company or organisation, and present a strategic dilemma.  Should a business incur the costs of defending what may be relatively low value claims? Or risk appearing to concede claims which are cumulatively valuable and which often include reputationally-damaging allegations? 

The small claims we are seeing include:

  • Reputational issues, such as allegations of dishonestly (or even fraudulently) withholding compensation or refunds.
  • Allegations of discrimination or hardship caused to vulnerable claimants.
  • Attacks on key business models, such as dynamic pricing. 
  • Senior leaders may be subject to allegations or even sued personally.

There is little prospect of enforcing confidentiality settlements, and social media means the risks of damaging allegations or effective claimant techniques spreading are greater than ever before. Threats to involve media or consumer groups are commonplace - albeit usually empty, they further emphasise the importance of careful and effective dispute handling to businesses’ image.

“People, processes and technology”

These trends can be combatted in a way that is legally and commercially effective, by bringing together the right people, processes and technology. Cumulatively, these small claims can be significant for many businesses, and the associated reputational risks often mean that using a third party would be ultimately cost-efficient.

Pitfalls of going-it alone

The “people” dimension is crucial. Deciding on the most appropriate line of defence is difficult, and requires a level of commercial and legal understanding and experience. County Courts are often indulgent of litigants in person, even where claims are difficult to understand, have no obvious legal basis or are even misleading. There is also the difficulty of obtaining costs against litigants in person, even under the unreasonable conduct costs provisions of the Civil Procedure Rules. 

These factors inadvertently encourage the most difficult and misconceived claims. Experience and judgement is required to strike the right balance between being robust, acting reasonably and conserving client resources. Distinguishing between dishonest or disruptive claimants and those who are genuinely vulnerable or have a real complaint is really important in determining the best posture and achieving an appropriate resolution.

The economies necessary in working on the Small Claims Track can be achieved by striking another balance between experienced legal staff using a light touch to identify the most complex and sensitive claims, and the use of claims handlers and paralegals. Non legally qualified staff can administer cost-effectively the generic procedural elements of claims, and those claims which do have a standard component (such as in bulk claims, for example for airline delays). Technology enables claims and groups of claims to be tracked as efficiently as possible, and that generic content collated where it is appropriate.

“Prevention is better than cure”

Those businesses who develop clear procedures pre-action will be better equipped to manage and avert claims effectively. Typically, businesses want to identify and deal fairly with meritorious claims, but the pre-action picture is complicated, largely due to the encouragement of social media. Potential LIPs frequently approach senior leadership, bypassing usual customer channels, shopping around an organisation seeking some traction. This is often instead of conventional pre-action correspondence and can lead to confusion and duplication. 

A major example of where businesses need clear and robust administrative and legal procedures is the frequent scenario where a company is sued under the name of a different group company, or under a brand name only, which may relate to numerous entities. Other incorrect details may also be used, giving rise to issues of service, or claims getting lost within the business – sometimes across multiple jurisdictions. Such claims may be obviously wrong, or there may be some reasonable ambiguity in the claim (for example where multiple group entities are involved in a customer relationship). There are many different permutations of these errors.  Businesses that don’t get these processes and responses right are at significant risk of default judgments, with legal and commercial consequences.

Small claims are tricky and dealing with any number of them is daunting. However, the damage can be limited. Strategies can be developed to identify and deal with claims earlier and better, limiting unnecessary litigation and costs, and saving customer relationships and reducing social media exposure where possible. Legal time and resources can then be concentrated on defeating the most complex claims and serious allegations from the most difficult litigants.

Subscribe to our Connections insights Sign-up now

Tags

litigation and disputes

Get in touch

NR
Nick Roberts
Senior Associate

Get in touch

NR
Nick Roberts
Senior Associate
Key takeaways from MIPIM 2025: Future-proofing data centres
3/25/2025 4:21:32 PM

Key takeaways from MIPIM 2025: Future-proofing data centres

By Kirsty Harrower
As the digital infrastructure landscape continues to evolve, increasing AI workloads present both challenges and opportunities for data...
1
35
36

Latest Insights

Summer reading arrived early: European Commission aims for balancing act in its review of merger guidelines
5/9/2025 8:36:59 AM

Summer reading arrived early: European Commission aims for balancing act in its review of merger guidelines

By Alexandra Rogers Sabine Holinde
Shaping future successes: My takeaways from "An evening with Annie Vernon"
5/8/2025 1:38:17 PM

Shaping future successes: My takeaways from "An evening with Annie Vernon"

By Emma Humphries
Maritime decarbonisation: Current issues facing shipping companies
5/1/2025 1:36:52 PM

Maritime decarbonisation: Current issues facing shipping companies

By Kelli Bodal Hansen Philip Roche
11
11

Explore our site

  • About
  • Careers
  • Diversity, equity and inclusion
  • People
  • Services
  • Insights
  • News

Key industries

  • Consumer markets
  • Energy, infrastructure and resources
  • Financial institutions
  • Life sciences and healthcare
  • Technology
  • Transport

Locations

  • Global coverage

Norton Rose Fulbright © 2024. All Rights Reserved.

  • Amsterdam
  • ●
  • Athens
  • ●
  • Austin
  • ●
  • Bangkok
  • ●
  • Beijing
  • ●
  • Brisbane
  • ●
  • Brussels
  • ●
  • Bujumbura**
  • ●
  • Calgary
  • ●
  • Canberra
  • ●
  • Cape Town
  • ●
  • Casablanca
  • ●
  • Dallas
  • ●
  • Denver
  • ●
  • Dubai
  • ●
  • Durban
  • ●
  • Düsseldorf
  • ●
  • Frankfurt
  • ●
  • Hamburg
  • ●
  • Harare**
  • ●
  • Hong Kong SAR
  • ●
  • Houston
  • ●
  • Istanbul
  • ●
  • Jakarta*
  • ●
  • Johannesburg
  • ●
  • Kampala**
  • ●
  • London
  • ●
  • Los Angeles
  • ●
  • Luxembourg
  • ●
  • Melbourne
  • ●
  • Mexico City
  • ●
  • Milan
  • ●
  • Minneapolis
  • ●
  • Monaco
  • ●
  • Montréal
  • ●
  • Munich
  • ●
  • Newcastle
  • ●
  • New York
  • ●
  • Nairobi**
  • ●
  • Ottawa
  • ●
  • Paris
  • ●
  • Perth
  • ●
  • Piraeus
  • ●
  • Québec
  • ●
  • Riyadh*
  • ●
  • San Antonio
  • ●
  • San Francisco
  • ●
  • São Paulo
  • ●
  • Shanghai
  • ●
  • Singapore
  • ●
  • St. Louis
  • ●
  • Sydney
  • ●
  • Tokyo
  • ●
  • Toronto
  • ●
  • Vancouver
  • ●
  • Warsaw
  • ●
  • Washington DC *associate office **alliance
  • Legal notices and disclaimers
  • Impressum
  • Standard terms
  • Blog network terms and conditions
  • Cookies policy
  • Privacy notice
  • Website access conditions
  • Fraud alerts
  • Modern Slavery Statements
  • Health plan machine readable files
  • Anti-Facilitation of Tax Evasion Statement
  • Suppliers
  • History
  • Remote access
  • Sitemap
Offices and locations

Norton Rose Fulbright © 2024. All Rights Reserved.

  • Amsterdam
  • ●
  • Athens
  • ●
  • Austin
  • ●
  • Bangkok
  • ●
  • Beijing
  • ●
  • Brisbane
  • ●
  • Brussels
  • ●
  • Bujumbura**
  • ●
  • Calgary
  • ●
  • Canberra
  • ●
  • Cape Town
  • ●
  • Casablanca
  • ●
  • Dallas
  • ●
  • Denver
  • ●
  • Dubai
  • ●
  • Durban
  • ●
  • Düsseldorf
  • ●
  • Frankfurt
  • ●
  • Hamburg
  • ●
  • Harare**
  • ●
  • Hong Kong SAR
  • ●
  • Houston
  • ●
  • Istanbul
  • ●
  • Jakarta*
  • ●
  • Johannesburg
  • ●
  • Kampala**
  • ●
  • London
  • ●
  • Los Angeles
  • ●
  • Luxembourg
  • ●
  • Melbourne
  • ●
  • Mexico City
  • ●
  • Milan
  • ●
  • Minneapolis
  • ●
  • Monaco
  • ●
  • Montréal
  • ●
  • Munich
  • ●
  • Newcastle
  • ●
  • New York
  • ●
  • Nairobi**
  • ●
  • Ottawa
  • ●
  • Paris
  • ●
  • Perth
  • ●
  • Piraeus
  • ●
  • Québec
  • ●
  • Riyadh*
  • ●
  • San Antonio
  • ●
  • San Francisco
  • ●
  • São Paulo
  • ●
  • Shanghai
  • ●
  • Singapore
  • ●
  • St. Louis
  • ●
  • Sydney
  • ●
  • Tokyo
  • ●
  • Toronto
  • ●
  • Vancouver
  • ●
  • Warsaw
  • ●
  • Washington DC *associate office **alliance
Policies and disclaimers
  • Legal notices and disclaimers
  • Impressum
  • Standard terms
  • Blog network terms and conditions
  • Cookies policy
  • Privacy notice
  • Website access conditions
  • Fraud alerts
  • Modern Slavery Statements
  • Health plan machine readable files
  • Anti-Facilitation of Tax Evasion Statement
  • Suppliers
  • History
  • Remote access
  • Sitemap
Visit our global site, or select a location
North America
  • Canada (English)
  • Canada (Français)
  • United States
Latin America
  • Brazil
  • Mexico
Europe
  • Belgium
  • Deutschland (Deutsch)
  • France
  • Germany (English)
  • Greece
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Poland
  • The Netherlands
  • Turkey
  • United Kingdom
Middle East
Africa
  • Burundi
  • Kenya
  • Morocco
  • South Africa
  • Uganda
  • Zimbabwe
Asia Pacific
  • Australia
  • China
  • Hong Kong SAR
  • Indonesia
  • Japan
  • Singapore
  • Thailand
Regional practices
  • India
  • Israel
  • Korea
  • Marshall Islands
  • Nordic region
  • Pakistan
  • Vietnam